Nigeria and the Boko Haram

In northeast Nigeria, a group cognise as Boko Haram, has grown rattling quickly and created fear end-to-end the country (National Counterterrorism Center). Boko Haram attacks schools and police stations, kidnaps occidental tourists, and bombs churches. It has effectuateed emphasis throughout the community. Boko Haram attacks government targets and causes massive damage, including painful sensation many unarmed civilians. Louise Richardson, who is the administrator dean of the Radcliffe Institute for innovative Study and has spent her flight studying terrorism, provides a utilitarian definition of terrorism in her book What Terrorists Want. I would take aim Boko Haram a terrorist group, since its transactionions meet only of seven Richardsons criteria for terrorist organizations. Therefore, U.S. government should regress responses, which are low-risk and low-cost, by having a better understanding on Boko Haram. \n\n1. Why Boko Haram is a Terrorist organic law\nIn 201 4, the U.S. Department of conjure announced the designation of Boko Haram as Foreign Terrorist Organization. This group has to a fault met the seven elements of Richardsons definition of terrorism. First, a terrorist act is politically stimulate  (Richardson 4). Boko Haram has attacked government target, such as police stations. It has been move to squeeze the Nigerian government to establish Sharia law (Adesoji). This is overly considered as Boko Harams political goal. In order to achieve their goals, Boko Haram caused rage. It meets the spot criteria, which is the acts have to involve violence or the threat of violence (Richardson 4). Boko Haram has caused violence throughout the world by shooting and bomb civilian public. Third, terrorism is the act of sub- reconcile groups, not states (Richardson 5). Boko Haram is a non-state organization, which is trying to establish its own state and government. \nCondition four says, the acid of terrorism is not to overtake t he enemy but to aerate a message ...